Moin! On 9 Jul 2025, at 17:44, Jim Reid wrote:
>> On 9 Jul 2025, at 15:43, John R Levine <[email protected]> wrote: >> >> I still don't see the point. > > <AOL Mode>Me too!</AOL Mode> > > Wearing no hats and speaking only for myself: > > Key tag collisions don't appear to be causing a significant problem. I > question if it's worth the WG's time kludging a solution for something that > has such a (at best) marginal impact. It would be a different story if there > was an angry mob with pitchforks and blazing torches demanding the WG fix > this problem for them. But there isn't. <sarcams/irony> There is none, because the people that this would help are to busy at work keeping the internet alive and can’t follow all these my domain is more special then your domain discussions that sometimes happen in this group. </> More constructive what would be the hurt of publishing a document saying “key tags can’t collide” so that future implementer can rely on that, given that most of the current good implementations already do it? There are people willing to work on that and there already is running code, which is more then we have for a lot of other drafts the working group accepts. So long -Ralf --- Ralf Weber _______________________________________________ DNSOP mailing list -- [email protected] To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected]
