Dear John, Vladimír and others,
On 17 Jun 2025 12:54:49 -0400 John Levine wrote:
The draft needs a lot of work...
... sure, we could adopt it as a potential informational RFC.
Thanks for taking the time to review the draft and for your initial
thoughts!
Any concrete suggestions for improvement would be very helpful — whether
in terms of structure, clarity, scope, or technical detail.
I’m also considering the best path forward.
One option is to proceed via the Independent Submission stream, while
still welcoming DNSOP feedback.
But I’d be interested in your (and the WG’s) view on whether adoption
within DNSOP might lead to a more useful and better-reviewed outcome —
even if it's ultimately published as an Informational RFC.
Happy to take guidance on either path.
Thanks!
--
Marco
https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/html/draft-davids-forsalereg
_______________________________________________
DNSOP mailing list -- [email protected]
To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected]
