It appears that Paul Hoffman <[email protected]> said: >This is a good idea, but I am wary of the implementation. Have the authors >done any testing on what will happen with resolvers >that are not aware of the new semantics? I ask because I can imagine that some >resolvers, when seeing the delegation to "." >would then pound mercilessly on the root servers. Maybe a different target for >the nowheres would cause less damage from >resolvers that don't know the new protocol?
We had the same question about RFC 7505, the "MX ." trick to say there's no e-mail. Someone looked, the traffic was miniscule. It couldn't hurt to check but I would be astonished if the result were different. As far as the merits go, as one of the authors of "MX ." I can hardly object. R's, John PS: So what happens if you have a DS next to your "NS ." ? _______________________________________________ DNSOP mailing list -- [email protected] To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected]
