Hi Paul, all On 30/05/2025 20:13, Paul Hoffman wrote:
- Some of the milestones listed are for drafts that are simply in "I-D exists" state, and some have not even been adopted by the WG (and might not ever be). This WG has had a bunch of documents that, when they go to WG Last Call, are shown to have very little interest. Some of those we shove forwards with too little review, others fall out of the WG altogether. Instead of listing everything that the WG has adopted, I propose listing only those that have had lots of active participation already. I propose only "Delegation Revalidation by DNS Resolvers", "DNS IPv6 Transport Operational Guidelines", and "Clarifications on CDS/CDNSKEY and CSYNC Consistency". I do not believe that we know whether the WG can fix "Structured Error Data for Filtered DNS" enough to make the IETF want it again.
Thank you for your suggestion to limit the set of drafts to those that have seen substantial WG effort. Regarding the structured-dns-error draft, the chairs still see an opportunity to incorporate feedback from the WG and the IETF LC in order to plan a WGLC in the second half of this year.
Additional feedback from the WG on the recharter text and the milestones is welcome. Our AD, Med, is planning to have the new DNSOP charter discussed by the IESG in the coming weeks.
Cheers, -- Benno _______________________________________________ DNSOP mailing list -- [email protected] To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected]
