Dear authors *and* DNSOP WG, Three DNSOP documents (draft-ietf-dnsop-rfc8624-bis, draft-ietf-dnsop-must-not-ecc-gost, draft-ietf-dnsop-must-not-sha1 [1]) were reviewed by the IESG last week on the 22nd of May 2025, now they could be approved and sent to the RFC editor for publication as there are no more blocking DISCUSS (thanks Med, Paul, Roman, Warren, and Wes).
I intend to approve them in one week, i.e., Wednesday 4th of June, to leave time to the authors to optionally address some comments (see below) and to give an opportunity to the DNSOP WG to have a look in the recent editorial changes. https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-dnsop-rfc8624-bis/ballot/ mainly about RFC 8624 being an informative reference (see also RFC 4960 and 9260) https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-dnsop-must-not-sha1/ballot/ mainly about Med and Paul comments. https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-dnsop-must-not-ecc-gost/ballot/ perhaps the last part of Paul comment (up to the authors) Regards -éric [1] if you wonder why an INT AD is the responsible AD for these 3 drafts, this is simply because Warren Kumari, one of the authors, was the OPS AD when publication was requested ;-)
_______________________________________________ DNSOP mailing list -- [email protected] To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected]
