On May 25, 2025, at 22:43, [email protected] wrote: > > Hi Paul, > > Thanks for the feedback. > > For this one: > >> Errata 6227 can be marked at "Hold for Update" because draft-ietf- >> dnsop-rfc8624-bis now has an IANA considerations section. > > It is true that the bis has now IANA actions, but those are driven by the new > changes in the bis, not because these were inherited or correcting actions > from 8624. > > FWIW, HFDU applies for: > > == > * Changes that are stylistic issues or simply make things read > better > > * Clearly wrong technical items that do not have a clear resolution > or requires further discussion > ==
I would claim that "they didn't have an IANA Considerations section and they should have" falls under "stylistic issues", particularly because we know that it is being fixed in the next version. --Paul Hoffman _______________________________________________ DNSOP mailing list -- [email protected] To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected]
