Petr Špaček <[email protected]> writes: [...] > > 4: whatever else the WG wants… :-)
> After this clarification, I support adoption. I do think the IETF as a whole should publish something, even if it's NOOP in the end (see 4 above). To answer some questions about the purpose of producing a document without an included action: The reality is that we do need to think about the problem space and document the conclusions. So whether it ends up being a proposed or informational document in the end, we can let the conversation play out. But we should publish something from "our side" of this special case/use. TL;DR: yes to adopting this as a starting point. -- Wes Hardaker USC/ISI _______________________________________________ DNSOP mailing list -- [email protected] To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected]
