Eric Vyncke \(evyncke\) writes: > Redirecting to [email protected], which is a more suitable place than the > concluded dnsext WG.
I dunno what my standing is in this whole thing, but would like to observe that when it went by in dnsext I thought to myself, "Yes, this should be accepted." > Reported by: Robert Edmonds <[email protected]> > > This restores the definition of EDNS0's OPT CLASS field as "sender's UDP > payload size" as it appeared in RFC 2671 rather than "requestor's UDP payload > size" which appeared in RFC 6891 (specifically it appears to have been > introduced in draft-ietf-dnsext-rfc2671bis-edns0-02). _______________________________________________ DNSOP mailing list -- [email protected] To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected]
