On Fri, Feb 28, 2025, at 12:32, Peter Thomassen wrote: > Here's a hybrid between the current and your proposed abstract; it's a > little shorter and thus seems more "abstract-suited": > > NEW > This document generalizes and extends the use of DNS NOTIFY (RFC > 1996) beyond conventional zone transfer hints, to allow triggering > other types of actions via the DNS that were previously lacking a > trigger mechanism. Notifications merely nudge the receiver to > initiate the desired action promptly (instead of on a schedule); they > do not alter the action itself (including any security checks it > might employ). > > To enable this functionality, a method for discovering the receiver > endpoint for such notification messages is introduced, via the new > DSYNC record type. Notification types are recorded in a new > registry, with initial support for parental NS and DS record updates > including DNSSEC bootstrapping.
This is excellent, and would have definitely improved my understanding of the draft's goals when I read it. It also fits much better with the 'generalized' part of the draft name. _______________________________________________ DNSOP mailing list -- [email protected] To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected]
