Dear all, Thanks for your patience as I was on vacations when the publication of this I-D was requested. As the DNSOP responsible AD is also an author, I was selected as the acting responsible AD for this I-D. Hence, here are some comments that I want to be addressed (either by replying to this email or by a revised I-D) before proceeding to the IETF Last Call.
1. The shepherd write-up is very terse , so far so good, but does not include a justification for the intended status (PS is the correct one of course) and is unclear whether authors have accepted to be cited as authors (even if I guess so) 2. Even if RFC 5933 is already marked historic, let’s be clear and add meta-data and text in abstract/introduction/and shepherd write-up that this I-D deprecates RFC 5933 3. Section 4, even if the “should” are not in uppercase, adding the consequences of not following the “should” should be explained 4. RFC 9499 appears as a reference but is not cited, please remove it Once the above points are addressed, I am proceeding with the publication of this important document. Regards, -éric
_______________________________________________ DNSOP mailing list -- [email protected] To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected]
