On Tue, Nov 26, 2024 at 6:26 PM Paul Hoffman <[email protected]> wrote:
> On Nov 26, 2024, at 14:41, A L <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > To use the "search" function one needs to know if a term is at all > > defined. To the reader, it may not be obvious if there's a term or > > just a word. Having alphabetical order, can establish the fact quite > > quickly. > > Again, this was discussed in the WG and the IETF. What you are proposing > is not an errata, it is a suggestion for a different format. The errata > process is not the correct way to suggest these things. > > > Alternatively, the document can contain an alphabetical index of _all_ > > terms defined within (not just the newly introduced ones). > > This proposal confuses me. Isn't that what the current index in the > document does? > I agree with Paul - the Authors put together a very complete Index: https://www.rfc-editor.org/rfc/rfc9499#name-index > > --Paul Hoffman > > _______________________________________________ > DNSOP mailing list -- [email protected] > To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected] >
_______________________________________________ DNSOP mailing list -- [email protected] To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected]
