On Tue, Sep 17, 2024 at 03:16:43PM +0200, Petr Špaček <[email protected]> wrote a message of 30 lines which said:
> I think EDE 29 (Synthesized) with text note "RFC 8482" is perfectly > appropriate for the made-up HINFO answer to ANY (or RRSIG or ...) query. I tend to disagree since RFC 8482 is about removing data that exists, not the opposite. But there is another question: should we try to save codepoint space by using the same EDE for many different uses (and using the extra text to demultiplex) or should we use the fact that the registration policy is quite open to register many codes? RFC 8914, section 5.2, does not offer any guidance. _______________________________________________ DNSOP mailing list -- [email protected] To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected]
