On Sep 11, 2024, at 06:22, Stephane Bortzmeyer <[email protected]> wrote: > > In the current registry for Extended DNS Error Codes (RFC 8914), there > are codes that may be interesting to add: > > * One to say that the response was deliberately minimal (RFC 8482) > * One to say that the response comes from a local root (RFC 8806) > * One to say that the response has been tailored because of ECS (RFC > 7871) [the most useful, IMHO] > > I am thinking about asking for a registration. Policy for this > registry is "first come, first served". Before I start sending email > to IANA, I ask your advice. Is it a good idea? Will the authors of > resolver / authoritative software use it?
Personally, I like the first and third, and can see value for receivers for them. The second seems like a diagnostic, and one that would rarely be used because it would only be relevant for queries about TLDs. As much as I like RFC 8806, I don't think having minimal and possibly bad data about it would help anyone. --Paul Hoffman _______________________________________________ DNSOP mailing list -- [email protected] To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected]
