On Thu, Jul 30, 2020 at 02:20:42PM +0000, Horn Bucking wrote: > > On 7/30/20, [email protected] wrote: > > > On 7/29/20 7:59 PM, Dan Schaper wrote: > > > You've told dnsmasq to send a lease with option 6 (DNS) set to > > > 10.88.13.3. Where dnsmasq forwards the queries to is not relevant to > > > your issue, you only have one upstream server configured. > > > > are you saying that this > > > > > > dhcp-option=tag:red,option:dns-server,10.88.13.3 > > > > dhcp-option=tag:green,option:dns-server,10.88.13.4 > > > > is not defining two upstream servers? > If you'd expect dnsmasq's DNS server to switch its upstream DNS based on > those options, that expectation would be entirely unjustified: > Those lines configure DHCP, not DNS. > > That first line instructs the DHCP server to hand out 10.88.13.3 as DNS > server when a red DHCP client is requesting that DHCP information, e.g. > during initial DHCP lease negotiation - likewise the second with 10.88.13.4 > for green clients. > A client will then send its DNS queries to that respective DNS server. > > S Irlapati, you did force your client to request a new DHCP lease to put > those options into effect, didn't you?
Original Poster: How can we, this mailinglist, make you less shy? Regards Geert Stappers -- Silence is hard to parse _______________________________________________ Dnsmasq-discuss mailing list [email protected] http://lists.thekelleys.org.uk/mailman/listinfo/dnsmasq-discuss
