For qtype 65:

https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-dnsop-svcb-https/00/?include_text=1 
<https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-dnsop-svcb-https/00/?include_text=1>

These types are not special. Resolvers should treat them as “unknown RRs” and 
just resolve them.

Roy

> On 16 Sep 2020, at 09:04, Greg Choules via dns-operations 
> <[email protected]> wrote:
> 
> 
> From: Greg Choules <[email protected]>
> Subject: QTYPEs 65 and 65479
> Date: 16 September 2020 at 09:04:58 GMT+1
> To: [email protected]
> 
> 
> Hello all.
> Recently, whilst looking for something else, tcpdump on one of our recursive 
> servers showed we are receiving queries with (from its point of view) 
> unrecognised types. Wireshark doesn't have a decode for them yet either. 
> There aren't many, yet. But it's more than just noise.
> A quick reverse lookup on the sources shows them all to be iPhone X or later.
> 
> Can anyone shed some light on what these are and whether we should be doing 
> something about them?
> 
> thanks, Greg
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> dns-operations mailing list
> [email protected]
> https://lists.dns-oarc.net/mailman/listinfo/dns-operations

_______________________________________________
dns-operations mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.dns-oarc.net/mailman/listinfo/dns-operations

Reply via email to