warren> We've often discussed if the tools are useful / doing what we warren> want. My concern with this is that it requires yet another app warren> installed for people to communicate;
I'm one of the first to bitch about this when I have to install yet another app. However, mattermost works fine in a browser, no app required. I was on firefox for the last OARC virtual meeting and had no issues with that method. dougb> I ask because OARC is taking on a lot, and from my naive and dougb> distant view seems to have developed a bit of NIH dougb> syndrome. Looking at the migration of dnsviz for example, it's dougb> not clear to me why OARC volunteered to take that project on dougb> without adequate resourcing. And subsequently it wasn't clear why dougb> cloud solutions weren't utilized, which I imagine could have been dougb> cheaper, and faster. To my knowledge the historical data is still dougb> missing, is that correct? I'd guess you're not a member and don't get the detailed breakdown of this in the member reports? Short version is that many of the decisions (including why cloud frequently isn't an option) boil down to member survey responses and restrictions in the data sharing agreements. Keith and the OARC staff evaluate choices based on these restrictions and then solicit member input before making final decisions. What you are seeing is not unilateral decisions by the staff but the staff implementing membership wishes. _______________________________________________ dns-operations mailing list [email protected] https://lists.dns-oarc.net/mailman/listinfo/dns-operations
