On Wed, Dec 11, 2019 at 03:51:14PM +0000, Livingood, Jason <[email protected]> wrote a message of 7 lines which said:
> Seems like the answer then is to have the resolver check for updates > more frequently. The file is tiny and so this is not in the least > going to be resource-intensive. Just check every XX minutes. This assumes that all resolvers will be well-behaved. If it were the case, we wouldn't need this proposal at all since proper caching and RFC 8020 would keep junk local. My concern is with the bad resolvers: they will have outdated copies of the zone, that's for sure. The choice is between "damn them, proceed anyway" (in the spirit of the DNS flag day) or "continue to accomodate bad resolvers". The first option will be hard to sell to the "stakeholders". I imagine the announcement "Root name service will be discontinued on 1 november 2030. Check that your resolver correctly implements RFC XXXX." _______________________________________________ dns-operations mailing list [email protected] https://lists.dns-oarc.net/mailman/listinfo/dns-operations
