Alex,
I think you missed this disclaimer in 
"All values in the example are illustration purpose only"

Generally speaking, there is no guarantee for a point to point link.


Arashmid

> -----Original Message-----
> From: dmm [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Alexandre
> Petrescu
> Sent: 20 August 2018 06:48
> To: [email protected]
> Subject: Re: [DMM] Fwd: New Version Notification for draft-hmm-dmm-5g-
> uplane-analysis-01.txt
> 
> Hi, thanks for the draft.  I am happy you wrote and published it.
> 
> I am looking forward for a packet capture from a live cellular network that
> illustrates this outer packet header format described in the draft.
> 
> In particular, the Source and Destination IPv6 addresses (not IPv4).
> 
> I can suppose that the two addresses would have same prefix, because that
> would be a point-to-point link and these links would have same prefix.  (i.e. 
> if
> the src is 2001:db8:1:1::1 then dst would be
> 2001:db8:1:1::2 and not 2001:db8:1:2::1).
> 
> This is only supposition from my side, because I have never seen a packet
> capture of this.
> 
> > 3.5.  Packet Format
> >
> >    Figure 4 shows a packet format example of GTP-U over IPv6 that
> >    carries an extension header for QFI and an IPv6 PDU.  All values in
> >    the example are illustration purpose only.  The encoding of PDU
> >    Session Container for QFI refers to [TS.38.415-3GPP].
> >
> >      0                   1                   2                   3
> >      0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1
> >      Outer IPv6 Header
> >      +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
> >      |Version|     DSCP=EF   |               Flow Label              |
> >      +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
> >      |          Payload Length       | NxtHdr=17(UDP)|    Hop Limit  |
> >      +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
> >      |                                                               |
> >      +                                                               +
> >      |                                                               |
> >      +                   Source IPv6 Address                         +
> >      |                        2001:db8:1:1::1                        |
> >      +                                                               +
> >      |                                                               |
> >      +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
> >      |                                                               |
> >      +                                                               +
> >      |                                                               |
> >      +              Destination IPv6 Address                         +
> >      |                        2001:db8:1:2::1                        |
> >      +                                                               +
> >      |                                                               |
> >      +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
> 
> 
> Alex
> 
> Le 10/08/2018 à 11:24, Shunsuke Homma a écrit :
> > Hi DMM folks,
> >
> > We reflected feedback from 3GPP CT4 on
> > draft-hmm-dmm-5g-uplane-analysis and uploaded the new version. We
> need
> > more reviews from both IETF and 3GPP for further improvement. We will
> > appreciate if you can give comments or feedback to this I-D.
> >
> > Best regards,
> >
> > Shunsuke
> >
> >
> > -------- Forwarded Message --------
> > Subject: New Version Notification for
> > draft-hmm-dmm-5g-uplane-analysis-01.txt
> > Date: Fri, 10 Aug 2018 01:44:20 -0700
> > From: [email protected]
> > To:  [email protected] <[email protected]>, Daniel Voyer
> > <[email protected]>, Takuya Miyasaka
> > <[email protected]>, Satoru Matsushima
> > <[email protected]>, Shunsuke Homma
> > <[email protected]>
> >
> >
> > A new version of I-D, draft-hmm-dmm-5g-uplane-analysis-01.txt
> > has been successfully submitted by Shunsuke Homma and posted to the
> > IETF repository.
> >
> > Name:        draft-hmm-dmm-5g-uplane-analysis
> > Revision:    01
> > Title:        User Plane Protocol and Architectural Analysis on 3GPP
> > 5G System Document date:    2018-08-10
> > Group:        Individual Submission
> > Pages:        30
> > URL:
> > https://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-hmm-dmm-5g-uplane-analysis-
> > 01.txt
> >
> > Status:
> > https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-hmm-dmm-5g-uplane-analysis/
> > Htmlized:
> > https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-hmm-dmm-5g-uplane-analysis-01
> > Htmlized:
> > https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/html/draft-hmm-dmm-5g-uplane-analysis
> > Diff:
> > https://www.ietf.org/rfcdiff?url2=draft-hmm-dmm-5g-uplane-analysis-01
> >
> > Abstract:
> >     This document analyzes the mobile user plane protocol and the
> >     architecture specified in 3GPP 5G documents.  The analysis work is
> > to
> >     clarify those specifications, extract protocol and architectural
> >     requirements and derive evaluation aspects for user plane
> > protocols
> >     on IETF side.  This work is corresponding to the User Plane
> > Protocol
> >     Study work on 3GPP side.
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > Please note that it may take a couple of minutes from the time of
> > submission until the htmlized version and diff are available at
> > tools.ietf.org.
> >
> > The IETF Secretariat
> >
> >
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > dmm mailing list
> > [email protected]
> > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dmm
> >
> 
> _______________________________________________
> dmm mailing list
> [email protected]
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dmm
_______________________________________________
dmm mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dmm

Reply via email to