Yes,
and we should also encourage them to talk in terms of prefixes also, not only in terms of addresses.

Whenever 3GPP says "SSC mode 1 ... IP address is preserved" it should say "IP address or IP prefix is preserved".

Because there are places where the 3GPP network gives a /56 prefix to UE using DHCPv6-PD. That's clearly not one address.

This is a question I made to the operator giving DHCPv6-PD: is the allocated /56 resisting handovers (stays same upon handovers)? I am told the /56 resists to handovers, to a certain extent.

Alex

Le 18/01/2018 à 13:36, Erik Kline a écrit :
Whatever the outcome, we should encourage them to consider separate
RAs from separate link-local router addresses for logically separate
data.  (Like PvDs, essentially)

Trying to allocate bits in the PIO and RIO for address type won't
really prove sustainable.

On 18 January 2018 at 21:30, Sri Gundavelli (sgundave)
<[email protected]> wrote:
Dear All,

Please review the attached LS from 3GPP SA2 on the RA meta-data related
work. Please send any comments you have to the chairs.


Sri




On 1/16/18, 2:45 PM, "Liaison Statement Management Tool" <[email protected]>
wrote:

Title: LS on indicating service continuity usage of the additional IPv6
prefix in Router Advertisement
Submission Date: 2018-01-16
URL of the IETF Web page: https://datatracker.ietf.org/liaison/1554/

From: Chang hong <[email protected]>
To: Sri Gundavelli <[email protected]>,Dapeng Liu
<[email protected]>,Terry Manderson <[email protected]>,Suresh
Krishnan <[email protected]>,Robert Hinden <[email protected]>,Ole
Troan <[email protected]>
Cc: Dapeng Liu <[email protected]>,Terry Manderson
<[email protected]>,IPv6 Maintenance Discussion List
<[email protected]>,Ole Troan <[email protected]>,Sri Gundavelli
<[email protected]>,The IETF Chair <[email protected]>,Robert Hinden
<[email protected]>,Distributed Mobility Management Discussion List
<[email protected]>,Suresh Krishnan <[email protected]>
Response Contacts: [email protected],[email protected]
Technical Contacts:
Purpose: For information

Body: 1. Overall Description:
3GPP working group SA2 (System Architecture) would like to inform the
IETF that SA2 has defined three SSC (Session and Service Continuity)
modes in 3GPP TS 23.501 ("Architecture for the 5G System") clause 5.6.9
as follows:
-     With SSC mode 1, the network preserves the connectivity service
provided to the UE. For the case of PDU Session of IPv4 or IPv6 type, the
IP address is preserved.
-     With SSC mode 2, the network may release the connectivity service
delivered to the UE and release the corresponding PDU Session. For the
case of IPv4 or IPv6 type, the network may release IP address(es) that
had been allocated to the UE.
-     With SSC mode 3, changes to the user plane can be visible to the UE,
while the network ensures that the UE suffers no loss of connectivity. A
connection through new PDU Session Anchor point is established before the
previous connection is terminated in order to allow for better service
continuity. For the case of IPv4 or IPv6 type, the IP address is not
preserved in this mode when the PDU Session Anchor changes.
SA2 has also adopted the use of IPv6 multi-homing in a PDU Session
(referred to as "multi-homed IPv6 PDU Session") as described in 3GPP TS
23.501 clause 5.6.4.3, a PDU Session being an association between the UE
and a Data Network that provides a data connectivity service, which is
also defined in 3GPP TS 23.501.
When a new IPv6 Prefix is assigned to the UE for a multi-homed IPv6 PDU
Session, SA2 has decided to use the Router Advertisement message
according to IETF RFC 4191 to deliver the new IPv6 prefix to the UE and
configure the Routing Rules in the UE by using the Route Information
Option.
SA2 is looking for a mechanism to deliver information regarding the
service continuity usage (e.g. whether the prefix can be replaced with or
without grace period) associated with the new IPv6 prefix to the UE via
the 5G System user plane.

SA2 understands that the IETF draft "draft-ietf-dmm-ondemand-mobility-12"
defines four IP address types that can be mapped to the three SSC modes
as follows:

-     SSC mode 1 corresponds to either FIXED or SESSION_LASTING;
-     SSC mode 2 corresponds to NON_PERSISTENT;
-     SSC mode 3 corresponds to GRACEFUL_REPLACEMENT.

SA2 would like to understand if there is any IETF work related to
delivery of the IP address type (according to IETF draft
"draft-ietf-dmm-ondemand-mobility-12") in the Router Advertisement
message, which could be used for delivery of the service continuity usage
associated with a new IPv6 prefix in a multi-homed IPv6 PDU Session.

2. Actions:
To IETF Internet Area, DMM, 6MAN:
ACTION:       SA2 respectfully asks IETF Internet Area, DMM and 6MAN to
provide feedback on any IETF work related to delivery of IP address type
(according to IETF draft "draft-ietf-dmm-ondemand-mobility-12") in the
Router Advertisement message.

3. Date of Next SA2 Meetings:
3GPPSA2#125  OR 22 - 26 Jan 2018    Gothenburg       SE
3GPPSA2#126  OR 26 Feb - 2 Mar 2018    US            US
Attachments:

    S2-179625_e-mail_rev2_S2-179363_LS_out_to_IETF_Internet_Area_DMM_6MAN

https://www.ietf.org/lib/dt/documents/LIAISON/liaison-2018-01-16-3gpp-tsg
s
a-sa2-int-6man-dmm-ls-on-indicating-service-continuity-usage-of-the-addit
i
onal-ipv6-prefix-in-router-advertisement-attachment-1.doc


_______________________________________________
dmm mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dmm


_______________________________________________
dmm mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dmm

_______________________________________________
dmm mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dmm

Reply via email to