Hi Diederik,

On 11 Dec 2017, at 23:16, Diederik de Groot via dmd-internals wrote:
From the above i gather, from your response, i should be ok with using 2.068 as the intermediate stage.

What might be easier than to use an intermediate stage is getting a DMD version tagged that is 2.068.2, but with the one D dependency removed. 2.068.2 is basically still entirely C++; only some auxiliary code has been converted to D to test the waters

For LDC, more specifically our last C++-based version (0.17.x/ltsmaster branch), we just reverted that change. The resulting 2.068.2-based compiler can directly bootstrap current master.

Best,
David
_______________________________________________
dmd-internals mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.puremagic.com/mailman/listinfo/dmd-internals

Reply via email to