Not to worry: The authors have it, and the chair (I) will also watch for it.

Barry

On Fri, Mar 13, 2026 at 7:04 AM Sean Whalen <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> Other thsan this list, is there a better way to bring this up so it's on 
> someone's list of things to address during AUTH48?
>
>
>
> Respectfully,
> Sean Whalen
>
> On Monday, February 23rd, 2026 at 10:46 PM, Barry Leiba 
> <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> > It won't fall to the errata process.  Real errors can still be
> > corrected in AUTH48.
> >
>
> > Barry
> >
>
> > On Mon, Feb 23, 2026 at 12:50 PM Todd Herr
> > <[email protected]> wrote:
> > >
> > > On Mon, Feb 23, 2026 at 3:08 PM Sean Whalen 
> > > <[email protected]> wrote:
> > >>
> > >> Hello,
> > >>
> > >> I'm the maintainer and original developer of the CheckDMARC and 
> > >> ParseDMARC tools, but this is my first time being active with anything 
> > >> IETF, so please let me know if there is a better place to address this. 
> > >> While reading draft-ietf-dmarc-dmarcbis-41, I noticed that section C.7. 
> > >> Report Generator Recommendations says:
> > >>
> > >>  This document in Section 4.6 says:
> > >>
> > >>   A report **SHOULD** be sent to each listed URI provided in the DMARC
> > >>   Policy Record.
> > >>
> > >>
> > >> However, section 4.6. DMARC Reporting URIs only says:
> > >>
> > >> [RFC3986] defines a syntax for identifying a resource. The DMARC 
> > >> mechanism uses this as the format by which a Domain Owner or PSO 
> > >> specifies the destination(s) for the two report types that are 
> > >> supported. The DMARC Policy Record format allows for a list of these 
> > >> URIs to be provided, with each URI separated by commas (ASCII 0x2c).
> > >>
> > >> A formal definition is provided in Section 4.8.
> > >
> > >
> > > Hi Sean.
> > >
> > > The document in question has long since been submitted to the RFC Editors 
> > > at the IETF.
> > >
> > > If they don't catch this as part of their work prior to final 
> > > publication, then it'll fall to the RFC Errata process after the document 
> > > has been published - 
> > > https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-rpc-errata-process/
> > >
> > > --
> > > Todd
> > >
> > > _______________________________________________
> > > dmarc mailing list -- [email protected]
> > > To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected]
> >
>
> > _______________________________________________
> > dmarc mailing list -- [email protected]
> > To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected]
> >

_______________________________________________
dmarc mailing list -- [email protected]
To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected]

Reply via email to