Alessandro Vesely writes: > I would amend the proposed charter as follows: > > OLD: > Accordingly, DMARC is being rechartered to publish a document that moves RFC > 8617 to historical/obsolete status, including prose describing the history > and > current status of the work. > > NEW: > Accordingly, DMARC is being rechartered to investigate the current status of > deployment and the possible potential, ultimately publishing a document that > either moves RFC 8617 to historical/obsolete status, or corrects its usage > model so that ARC can effectively regain its intended role.
I think this addition is needed, I myself do think ARC did succeed and it DOES SOLVE problem, especially for the unmodified forwading case (not mailing lists, but when someone just decideds to forward their @ieee.org, @iki.fi etc address their actual mailbox). In that case the authorization is already done by the user when he/she sets the forwarding, and he/she can configure the same authorization in his/her actual mailbox. -- [email protected] _______________________________________________ dmarc mailing list -- [email protected] To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected]
