On Tue, Jul 1, 2025 at 12:12 PM Alessandro Vesely <[email protected]> wrote:
> On Mon 30/Jun/2025 17:44:10 +0200 Dotzero wrote: > > I propose the following tweak to the Introduction of the Failure > Reporting > > draft: > > > A couple of questions: > > > > Failure reports (RUF) provide detailed information about the failure of > a > > single message, or a group of similar messages failing for the same > reason. > > > What is the meaning of RUF? I tend to imagine something like Reporting > Url > (for) Failure (reports), which refers to an email address, not the report > itself. > It's just a tag value defined in the main DMARC document. I wouldn't get too hung up on it. Originally we used the phrase "forensic report" but that morphed into "failure report". > > > > They are meant to aid in a) cases where a Domain Owner is unable to > detect why > > failures that were reported in aggregate form occurred or b) it is > important to > > the Sender domain to quickly identify and address mail involving abusive > mail > > involving direct domain abuse. > > > This sentence needs rewording, since (a) and (b) are not symmetric. How > about: > > Their purpose is twofold. On the one hand they are meant to aid in > cases > where a Domain Owner is unable to detect why failures that were > reported in > aggregate form occurred. On the other hand, they can allow the Sender > domain to quickly identify and address harmful messages involving > direct > domain abuse. > Your wording is much more elegant. I agree with your wording. Michael Hammer
_______________________________________________ dmarc mailing list -- [email protected] To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected]
