On Wed, 11 Jun 2025, Alessandro Vesely wrote:
There are companies whose business model largely consists of processing
aggregate reports and providing annotated summaries to paying customers.
Surely this is not news to you.
I think the wording in the I-D is sufficient to discourage having failure
reports processed by third parties.
Anyway, however closely those companies try an meet their customers needs,
they don't tell us what the effect of their effort is, for example how often
their pages are visited. I imagine that, after the initial period, this
happens only occasionally. Do they have alarms to be set in case of failure
spikes? They should be able to differenziate the mailing lists for this to
make sense (again, ditto for failure reports).
I really do not understand what point you are making here. People find
aggregate reports useful enough to build businesses around them. But
failure reports are useless.
R's,
John
_______________________________________________
dmarc mailing list -- [email protected]
To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected]
