Are said ARCs started by Microsoft? Is there any commonality in the i=1~2 set sealers where the chain is broken?
- Mark Alley On Wed, Jun 11, 2025, 6:02 AM Douglas Foster < [email protected]> wrote: > I have recently noticed that 25% of all ARC chains arrive broken, because > of outbound gateway services that make unintended changes. Messages still > pass DMARC, because the vendors add a client signature after the cause the > damage. Nonetheless, trust is broken and mailing list problems return. > > Is this event covered by either aggregate reporting or failure reporting? > > DF > _______________________________________________ > dmarc mailing list -- [email protected] > To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected] >
_______________________________________________ dmarc mailing list -- [email protected] To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected]
