On 14/05/2025 18:13, Andrew (andy) Newton wrote:
On 5/14/25 11:54, Todd Herr wrote:
On Tue, May 13, 2025 at 5:01 PM The IESG <[email protected]
<mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:
[snip]
This working group will submit the failure reporting document
(draft-ietf-dmarc-failure-reporting-13) to the IESG no later than six months
from working group formation. If it fails to meet this deadline or reaches
consensus to cease work on the failure reporting document
(draft-ietf-dmarc-failure-reporting-13), it will abandon that objective and
instead begin the work of removing all references from the base document
(draft-ietf-dmarc-failure-reporting-13) to the failure reporting document,
and the latter will be permanently abandoned.
I believe the last paragraph of the proposed charter to be in error,
specifically the last sentence, and that it should read:
This working group will submit the failure reporting document
(draft-ietf-dmarc-failure-reporting-13) to the IESG no later than six months
from working group formation. If it fails to meet this deadline or reaches
consensus to cease work on the failure reporting document
(draft-ietf-dmarc-failure-reporting-13), it will abandon that objective and
instead begin the work of removing all references from the base document
(draft-ietf-dmarc-dmarcbis-41) to the failure reporting document,
and the latter will be permanently abandoned.
Doh!
It took me a while to spot the difference: (draft-ietf-dmarc-dmarcbis-41).
Best
Ale
--
_______________________________________________
dmarc mailing list -- [email protected]
To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected]
