I'm not sure I understand your comment below. Are you commenting on the " up to the Receiver's limits on supported URIs" ? That suggests that a message receiver (report generator, not report receiver) may have a limit on the number of URIs they're willing to send reports to. If that's your nit, I can make that more clear.
-- Alex Brotman Sr. Engineer, Anti-Abuse & Messaging Policy Comcast > -----Original Message----- > From: Orie Steele via Datatracker <[email protected]> > Sent: Friday, February 28, 2025 9:46 AM > To: The IESG <[email protected]> > Cc: [email protected]; [email protected]; > [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected] > Subject: Orie Steele's No Objection on draft-ietf-dmarc-aggregate-reporting- > 29: (with COMMENT) > > Orie Steele has entered the following ballot position for > draft-ietf-dmarc-aggregate-reporting-29: No Objection > > When responding, please keep the subject line intact and reply to all email > addresses included in the To and CC lines. (Feel free to cut this introductory > paragraph, however.) > > > Please refer to > https://urldefense.com/v3/__https://www.ietf.org/about/groups/iesg/state > ments/handling-ballot- > positions/__;!!CQl3mcHX2A!BuRISkuxX4W9qRx2GroqLwMI0nyMJzcXyAQnH > y3LhLzNiTnk6hqDlEiCFKmWWUf7UYdUVhZWDzITjSZ1E_I$ > for more information about how to handle DISCUSS and COMMENT positions. > > > The document, along with other ballot positions, can be found here: > https://urldefense.com/v3/__https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf- > dmarc-aggregate- > reporting/__;!!CQl3mcHX2A!BuRISkuxX4W9qRx2GroqLwMI0nyMJzcXyAQnH > y3LhLzNiTnk6hqDlEiCFKmWWUf7UYdUVhZWDzITA-64-NQ$ > > > > ---------------------------------------------------------------------- > COMMENT: > ---------------------------------------------------------------------- > > Thanks for addressing my comments in -29. > > ### Nits > > In -29, the word remaining here is perhaps no longer needed: > > ``` > An attempt MUST be made to deliver an aggregate report to > every remaining URI, up to the Receiver's limits on supported URIs. > ``` > > I think the intended behavior with the changes from -29 is to attempt to > deliver to all URIs. > > _______________________________________________ dmarc mailing list -- [email protected] To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected]
