Good point, thanks very much, but I think I'll just live with the way it currently works.
What I've done is to take a bit more care how and where I place template tags, and this has improved things somewhat. On Dec 4, 1:25 am, adelevie <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > You may also want to look at BeautifulSoup. It is an html parser > writter for python. It has a method called soup.prettify() in which > "soup" is a string of html. prettify() outputs cleanly formatted html. > Approximation: > soup = "<html><body><h1>title</h1><p>hello world</p></body></html>" > soup.pretiffy()>>> <html> > > <body> > <h1>title</h1> > <p>hello world</p> > </body> > </html> > > I hope this helps. > > On Dec 3, 3:00 am, Tonne <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > > Thank you for the detailed response, Malcolm. I wasn't aware of the > > complexities of the issue and understand better now why it is the way > > it is. It was something that was really bugging me, but I feel like I > > can let it go now :) > > > I'm not skilled enough in Python to take a crack at solving the > > problem myself. Although I'd prefer my HTML source output to look > > good, I'll take readability of template code (and performance) over > > rendered output prettiness. > > > Thanks again. --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Django users" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/django-users?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
