On Wed, Oct 19, 2011 at 5:17 PM, Kurtis Mullins <[email protected]> wrote: > Good idea. I'm going to check out MongoDB for this. Looks like there's > already some Django tools for it out there. > > On Wed, Oct 19, 2011 at 5:57 PM, Donald Stufft <[email protected]> > wrote: >> >> If I wanted maximum performance from a distributed on the fly template >> system. I'd probably store them in a fast document db.
note that 'document' in MongoDB parlance means 'complex document', as in 'more complex than a field'. in this case, the template is just a (long?) text string. any good DB (relational or not) should perform similarly, given the same hardware. -- Javier -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Django users" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected]. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/django-users?hl=en.
