django-updates
Thread
Date
Earlier messages
Later messages
Messages by Thread
Re: [Django] #36793: Reverting a model rename in an environment with pre-Django 6.0 permission records leaves wrong users & groups associated
Django
Re: [Django] #36793: Reverting a model rename in an environment with pre-Django 6.0 permission records leaves wrong users & groups associated
Django
Re: [Django] #36793: Reverting a model rename in an environment with pre-Django 6.0 permission records leaves wrong users & groups associated
Django
Re: [Django] #36793: Reverting a model rename in an environment with pre-Django 6.0 permission records leaves wrong users & groups associated
Django
Re: [Django] #36793: Reverting a model rename in an environment with pre-Django 6.0 permission records leaves wrong users & groups associated
Django
Re: [Django] #36793: Reverting a model rename in an environment with pre-Django 6.0 permission records leaves wrong users & groups associated
Django
Re: [Django] #36793: Reverting a model rename in an environment with pre-Django 6.0 permission records leaves wrong users & groups associated
Django
Re: [Django] #36793: Reverting a model rename in an environment with pre-Django 6.0 permission records leaves wrong users & groups associated
Django
Re: [Django] #36793: Reverting a model rename in an environment with pre-Django 6.0 permission records leaves wrong users & groups associated
Django
Re: [Django] #36793: Reverting a model rename in an environment with pre-Django 6.0 permission records leaves wrong users & groups associated
Django
Re: [Django] #36793: Reverting a model rename in an environment with pre-Django 6.0 permission records leaves wrong users & groups associated
Django
Re: [Django] #36793: Reverting a model rename in an environment with pre-Django 6.0 permission records leaves wrong users & groups associated
Django
Re: [Django] #36793: Reverting a model rename in an environment with pre-Django 6.0 permission records leaves wrong users & groups associated
Django
Re: [Django] #36793: Reverting a model rename in an environment with pre-Django 6.0 permission records leaves wrong users & groups associated
Django
Re: [Django] #36793: Reverting a model rename in an environment with pre-Django 6.0 permission records leaves wrong users & groups associated
Django
Re: [Django] #36790: Add a generic error view handler (was: Refactor error view handlers to be generic)
Django
[Django] #36795: Always quote user-provided aliases
Django
Re: [Django] #36795: Always quote user-provided aliases
Django
Re: [Django] #36795: Always quote user-provided aliases
Django
Re: [Django] #36795: Always quote user-provided aliases
Django
Re: [Django] #36795: Always quote user-provided aliases
Django
Re: [Django] #36795: Always quote user-provided aliases
Django
[Django] #36794: Cache python dependencies on GitHub Actions
Django
Re: [Django] #36794: Cache python dependencies on GitHub Actions
Django
Re: [Django] #36794: Cache python dependencies on GitHub Actions
Django
Re: [Django] #36794: Cache python dependencies on GitHub Actions
Django
Re: [Django] #36794: Cache python dependencies on GitHub Actions
Django
Re: [Django] #36794: Cache python dependencies on GitHub Actions
Django
Re: [Django] #36794: Cache python dependencies on GitHub Actions
Django
Re: [Django] #36794: Cache python dependencies on GitHub Actions
Django
Re: [Django] #36794: Cache python dependencies on GitHub Actions
Django
Re: [Django] #36794: Cache python dependencies on GitHub Actions
Django
Re: [Django] #36794: Cache python dependencies on GitHub Actions
Django
Re: [Django] #36794: Cache python dependencies on GitHub Actions
Django
Re: [Django] #36793: Reverting a model rename in an environment with pre-Django 6.0 permission records leaves wrong users & groups associated (was: Reversing RenameModel in an environment with pre-Django 6.0 permission records leaves wrong users & groups associated)
Django
[Django] #36793: Reversing RenameModel in an environment with pre-Django 6.0 permission records leaves wrong users & groups associated
Django
Re: [Django] #36793: Reversing RenameModel in an environment with pre-Django 6.0 permission records leaves wrong users & groups associated
Django
Re: [Django] #27890: runtests.py cleanup exception on Python 3.6
Django
Re: [Django] #27890: runtests.py cleanup exception on Python 3.6
Django
Re: [Django] #27890: runtests.py cleanup exception on Python 3.6
Django
Re: [Django] #27890: runtests.py cleanup exception on Python 3.6
Django
[Django] #36792: Add support for virtual generated columns (PostgreSQL 18+) in GeneratedField
Django
Re: [Django] #36792: Add support for virtual generated columns (PostgreSQL 18+) in GeneratedField
Django
Re: [Django] #36792: Add support for virtual generated columns (PostgreSQL 18+) in GeneratedField
Django
[Django] #36791: Migration does not drop old M2M through-table when ManyToManyField target model changes
Django
Re: [Django] #36791: Migration does not drop old M2M through-table when ManyToManyField target model changes
Django
Re: [Django] #36791: Migration does not drop old M2M through-table when ManyToManyField target model changes
Django
Re: [Django] #36791: Migration does not drop old M2M through-table when ManyToManyField target model changes
Django
Re: [Django] #36791: Migration does not drop old M2M through-table when ManyToManyField target model changes
Django
Re: [Django] #36791: Migration does not drop old M2M through-table when ManyToManyField target model changes
Django
Re: [Django] #36791: Migration does not drop old M2M through-table when ManyToManyField target model changes
Django
Re: [Django] #36791: Migration does not drop old M2M through-table when ManyToManyField target model changes
Django
Re: [Django] #36791: Migration does not drop old M2M through-table when ManyToManyField target model changes
Django
Re: [Django] #36791: Migration does not drop old M2M through-table when ManyToManyField target model changes
Django
Re: [Django] #36791: Migration does not drop old M2M through-table when ManyToManyField target model changes
Django
Re: [Django] #36791: Migration does not drop old M2M through-table when ManyToManyField target model changes
Django
Re: [Django] #36791: Migration does not drop old M2M through-table when ManyToManyField target model changes
Django
Re: [Django] #36791: Migration does not drop old M2M through-table when ManyToManyField target model changes
Django
Re: [Django] #36791: Migration does not drop old M2M through-table when ManyToManyField target model changes
Django
Re: [Django] #36791: Migration does not drop old M2M through-table when ManyToManyField target model changes
Django
Re: [Django] #36025: __range lookup in conditional aggregate with subquery annotation does not use annotated related fields
Django
Re: [Django] #33647: bulk_update and bulk_create silently truncating values for size limited fields on postgres
Django
Re: [Django] #33647: bulk_update and bulk_create silently truncating values for size limited fields on postgres
Django
Re: [Django] #33647: bulk_update and bulk_create silently truncating values for size limited fields on postgres
Django
Re: [Django] #33647: bulk_update and bulk_create silently truncating values for size limited fields on postgres
Django
Re: [Django] #33647: bulk_update and bulk_create silently truncating values for size limited fields on postgres
Django
Re: [Django] #33647: bulk_update and bulk_create silently truncating values for size limited fields on postgres
Django
Re: [Django] #33647: bulk_update and bulk_create silently truncating values for size limited fields on postgres
Django
Re: [Django] #33647: bulk_update and bulk_create silently truncating values for size limited fields on postgres
Django
Re: [Django] #33647: bulk_update and bulk_create silently truncating values for size limited fields on postgres
Django
Re: [Django] #33647: bulk_update and bulk_create silently truncating values for size limited fields on postgres
Django
Re: [Django] #33647: bulk_update and bulk_create silently truncating values for size limited fields on postgres
Django
Re: [Django] #33647: bulk_update and bulk_create silently truncating values for size limited fields on postgres
Django
[Django] #36790: Refactor error view handlers to be generic
Django
[Django] #36789: PDF Docs builds are broken
Django
Re: [Django] #36789: PDF Docs builds are broken
Django
Re: [Django] #36789: PDF Docs builds are broken
Django
Re: [Django] #36789: PDF Docs builds are broken
Django
Re: [Django] #36789: PDF Docs builds are broken
Django
Re: [Django] #36789: PDF Docs builds are broken
Django
Re: [Django] #36789: PDF Docs builds are broken
Django
Re: [Django] #33647: bulk_update and bulk_create silently truncating values for size limited fields on postgres (was: bulk_update silently truncating values for size limited fields)
Django
Re: [Django] #31202: Bulk update suffers from poor performance with large numbers of models and columns
Django
[Django] #36788: horizontal alignment of fields in admin change not working in 6.0
Django
Re: [Django] #36788: horizontal alignment of fields in admin change not working in 6.0
Django
Re: [Django] #36788: horizontal alignment of fields in admin change not working in 6.0
Django
Re: [Django] #36788: horizontal alignment of fields in admin change not working in 6.0
Django
Re: [Django] #36788: horizontal alignment of fields in admin change not working in 6.0
Django
Re: [Django] #36788: horizontal alignment of fields in admin change not working in 6.0
Django
Re: [Django] #36788: horizontal alignment of fields in admin change not working in 6.0
Django
Re: [Django] #36513: Background color for admin's m2m multi-select "selected" rows is broken in Edge
Django
Re: [Django] #36513: Background color for admin's m2m multi-select "selected" rows is broken in Edge
Django
Re: [Django] #36513: Background color for admin's m2m multi-select "selected" rows is broken in Edge
Django
Re: [Django] #36513: Background color for admin's m2m multi-select "selected" rows is broken in Edge
Django
Re: [Django] #36513: Background color for admin's m2m multi-select "selected" rows is broken in Edge
Django
Re: [Django] #33647: bulk_update silently truncating values for size limited fields
Django
Re: [Django] #33647: bulk_update silently truncating values for size limited fields
Django
[Django] #36787: In and Range lookups crash when provided to filter() if RHS contains mix of expressions and strings
Django
Re: [Django] #36787: In and Range lookups crash when provided to filter() if RHS contains mix of expressions and strings
Django
Re: [Django] #36787: In and Range lookups crash when provided to filter() if RHS contains mix of expressions and strings
Django
Re: [Django] #36787: In and Range lookups crash when provided to filter() if RHS contains mix of expressions and strings
Django
Re: [Django] #36787: In and Range lookups crash when provided to filter() if RHS contains mix of expressions and strings
Django
Re: [Django] #36787: In and Range lookups crash when provided to filter() if RHS contains mix of expressions and strings
Django
Re: [Django] #36787: In and Range lookups crash when provided to filter() if RHS contains mix of expressions and strings
Django
Re: [Django] #36787: In and Range lookups crash when provided to filter() if RHS contains mix of expressions and strings
Django
Re: [Django] #36787: In and Range lookups crash when provided to filter() if RHS contains mix of expressions and strings
Django
Re: [Django] #36787: In and Range lookups crash when provided to filter() if RHS contains mix of expressions and strings
Django
Re: [Django] #36787: In and Range lookups crash when provided to filter() if RHS contains mix of expressions and strings
Django
Re: [Django] #36787: In and Range lookups crash when provided to filter() if RHS contains mix of expressions and strings
Django
Re: [Django] #36787: In and Range lookups crash when provided to filter() if RHS contains mix of expressions and strings
Django
Re: [Django] #36787: In and Range lookups crash when provided to filter() if RHS contains mix of expressions and strings
Django
Re: [Django] #36785: bulk_create lack of implicit transaction.atomic usage surfaces improper nested error handling
Django
Re: [Django] #36785: bulk_create lack of implicit transaction.atomic usage surfaces improper nested error handling (was: v6 seems to break the behaviour of transaction.atomic)
Django
[Django] #36786: XML serializer mishandles nullable elements of a related object's natural key
Django
Re: [Django] #36786: XML serializer mishandles nullable elements of a related object's natural key
Django
Re: [Django] #36786: XML serializer mishandles nullable elements of a related object's natural key
Django
Re: [Django] #36786: XML serializer mishandles nullable elements of a related object's natural key
Django
Re: [Django] #36786: XML serializer mishandles nullable elements of a related object's natural key
Django
Re: [Django] #36786: XML serializer mishandles nullable elements of a related object's natural key
Django
Re: [Django] #36786: XML serializer mishandles nullable elements of a related object's natural key
Django
Re: [Django] #36786: XML serializer mishandles nullable elements of a related object's natural key
Django
[Django] #36785: v6 seems to break the behaviour of transaction.atomic
Django
Re: [Django] #36785: v6 seems to break the behaviour of transaction.atomic
Django
Re: [Django] #36785: v6 seems to break the behaviour of transaction.atomic
Django
Re: [Django] #36785: v6 seems to break the behaviour of transaction.atomic
Django
Re: [Django] #36785: v6 seems to break the behaviour of transaction.atomic
Django
Re: [Django] #36785: v6 seems to break the behaviour of transaction.atomic
Django
[Django] #36784: Add CSP support to Django's script object and media objects
Django
Re: [Django] #36784: Add CSP support to Django's script object and media objects
Django
Re: [Django] #36784: Add CSP support to Django's script object and media objects
Django
Re: [Django] #36784: Add CSP support to Django's script object and media objects
Django
Re: [Django] #36784: Add CSP support to Django's script object and media objects
Django
Re: [Django] #36784: Add CSP support to Django's script object and media objects
Django
Re: [Django] #36784: Add CSP support to Django's script object and media objects
Django
Re: [Django] #36784: Add CSP support to Django's script object and media objects
Django
Re: [Django] #36784: Add CSP support to Django's script object and media objects
Django
Re: [Django] #36784: Add CSP support to Django's script object and media objects
Django
Re: [Django] #36784: Add CSP support to Django's script object and media objects
Django
Re: [Django] #36784: Add CSP support to Django's script object and media objects
Django
Re: [Django] #36784: Add CSP support to Django's script object and media objects
Django
Re: [Django] #36784: Add CSP support to Django's script object and media objects
Django
Re: [Django] #36189: Deprecate `"use_returning_into" database option.
Django
Re: [Django] #36189: Deprecate `"use_returning_into" database option.
Django
Re: [Django] #36189: Deprecate `"use_returning_into" database option.
Django
Re: [Django] #36189: Deprecate `"use_returning_into" database option.
Django
Re: [Django] #36189: Deprecate `"use_returning_into" database option.
Django
Re: [Django] #36189: Deprecate `"use_returning_into" database option.
Django
Re: [Django] #36189: Deprecate `"use_returning_into" database option.
Django
Re: [Django] #36189: Deprecate `"use_returning_into" database option.
Django
[Django] #36783: {% querystring %} loses multi-value QueryDict in 6.0
Django
Re: [Django] #36783: {% querystring %} loses multi-value QueryDict in 6.0
Django
Re: [Django] #36783: {% querystring %} loses multi-value QueryDict in 6.0
Django
Re: [Django] #36783: {% querystring %} loses multi-value QueryDict in 6.0
Django
Re: [Django] #36783: {% querystring %} loses multi-value QueryDict in 6.0
Django
Re: [Django] #36783: {% querystring %} loses multi-value QueryDict in 6.0
Django
Re: [Django] #36783: {% querystring %} loses multi-value QueryDict in 6.0
Django
Re: [Django] #36783: {% querystring %} loses multi-value QueryDict in 6.0
Django
Re: [Django] #36783: {% querystring %} loses multi-value QueryDict in 6.0
Django
Re: [Django] #36783: {% querystring %} loses multi-value QueryDict in 6.0
Django
Re: [Django] #36783: {% querystring %} loses multi-value QueryDict in 6.0
Django
Re: [Django] #35581: Upgrade django.core.mail to use Python's modern email API
Django
Re: [Django] #35581: Upgrade django.core.mail to use Python's modern email API
Django
Re: [Django] #24448: Add a management command to generate new SECRET_KEY
Django
[Django] #36782: Add management command for generating a Django SECRET_KEY
Django
Re: [Django] #36782: Add management command for generating a Django SECRET_KEY
Django
Re: [Django] #36782: Add management command for generating a Django SECRET_KEY
Django
Re: [Django] #36782: Add management command for generating a Django SECRET_KEY
Django
Re: [Django] #36782: Add management command for generating a Django SECRET_KEY
Django
Re: [Django] #36782: Add management command for generating a Django SECRET_KEY
Django
Re: [Django] #36782: Add management command for generating a Django SECRET_KEY
Django
Re: [Django] #32567: Issues with ":" and "|" characters in URLs when using LiveServerTestCase on Windows
Django
Re: [Django] #32567: Issues with ":" and "|" characters in URLs when using LiveServerTestCase on Windows
Django
Re: [Django] #32567: Issues with ":" and "|" characters in URLs when using LiveServerTestCase on Windows
Django
Re: [Django] #32567: Issues with ":" and "|" characters in URLs when using LiveServerTestCase on Windows
Django
Re: [Django] #32567: Issues with ":" and "|" characters in URLs when using LiveServerTestCase on Windows
Django
Re: [Django] #32567: Issues with ":" and "|" characters in URLs when using LiveServerTestCase on Windows
Django
Re: [Django] #32567: Issues with ":" and "|" characters in URLs when using LiveServerTestCase on Windows
Django
[Django] #36781: Add Granian to Django deployment documentation (ASGI & WSGI support)
Django
Re: [Django] #36781: Add Granian to Django deployment documentation (ASGI & WSGI support)
Django
Re: [Django] #36781: Add Granian to Django deployment documentation (ASGI & WSGI support)
Django
Re: [Django] #36781: Add Granian to Django deployment documentation (ASGI & WSGI support)
Django
Re: [Django] #36781: Add Granian to Django deployment documentation (ASGI & WSGI support)
Django
Re: [Django] #36781: Add Granian to Django deployment documentation (ASGI & WSGI support)
Django
Re: [Django] #36781: Add Granian to Django deployment documentation (ASGI & WSGI support)
Django
Re: [Django] #36781: Add Granian to Django deployment documentation (ASGI & WSGI support)
Django
Re: [Django] #36781: Add Granian to Django deployment documentation (ASGI & WSGI support)
Django
Re: [Django] #36781: Add Granian to Django deployment documentation (ASGI & WSGI support)
Django
Re: [Django] #36781: Add Granian to Django deployment documentation (ASGI & WSGI support)
Django
[Django] #36780: Some minor and major issues with django admin ui.
Django
Re: [Django] #36780: Some minor and major issues with django admin ui.
Django
Re: [Django] #36780: Some minor and major issues with django admin ui.
Django
Re: [Django] #36780: Some minor and major issues with django admin ui.
Django
Re: [Django] #36780: Some minor and major issues with django admin ui.
Django
[Django] #36779: DeleteModel can lead to missing FK constraints
Django
Re: [Django] #36779: DeleteModel can lead to missing FK constraints
Django
Re: [Django] #36779: DeleteModel can lead to missing FK constraints
Django
Re: [Django] #36779: DeleteModel can lead to missing FK constraints
Django
Re: [Django] #36779: DeleteModel can lead to missing FK constraints
Django
Re: [Django] #36779: DeleteModel can lead to missing FK constraints
Django
Re: [Django] #36779: DeleteModel can lead to missing FK constraints
Django
Earlier messages
Later messages