#36964: Documentation incorrectly states that persistent connections don't work
with runserver
-------------------------------------+-------------------------------------
     Reporter:  Adam Sołtysik        |                     Type:
                                     |  Cleanup/optimization
       Status:  new                  |                Component:
                                     |  Documentation
      Version:  5.2                  |                 Severity:  Normal
     Keywords:                       |             Triage Stage:
                                     |  Unreviewed
    Has patch:  0                    |      Needs documentation:  0
  Needs tests:  0                    |  Patch needs improvement:  0
Easy pickings:  0                    |                    UI/UX:  0
-------------------------------------+-------------------------------------
 From https://docs.djangoproject.com/en/5.2/ref/databases/#caveats:

 > The development server creates a new thread for each request it handles,
 negating the effect of persistent connections. Don’t enable them during
 development.

 Something here seems to be incorrect. I'm using `'CONN_MAX_AGE': None`
 with the development server, and it works as expected. My requests are
 significantly faster than with the default setting. When analyzing with
 `SELECT * FROM pg_stat_activity WHERE datname = '<dbname>'`, I can see a
 single connection created and persisting after the first request, and it
 disappears after autoreload.
-- 
Ticket URL: <https://code.djangoproject.com/ticket/36964>
Django <https://code.djangoproject.com/>
The Web framework for perfectionists with deadlines.

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"Django updates" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to [email protected].
To view this discussion visit 
https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/django-updates/0107019cae12bf4e-38a35a68-71ee-4011-a280-e74dec236382-000000%40eu-central-1.amazonses.com.

Reply via email to