#35674: Provide a check for settings removed (post deprecation)
-------------------------------------+-------------------------------------
     Reporter:  Serafeim             |                    Owner:  Ronny
  Papastefanos                       |  Vedrilla
         Type:  New feature          |                   Status:  assigned
    Component:  Core (System         |                  Version:  5.1
  checks)                            |
     Severity:  Normal               |               Resolution:
     Keywords:                       |             Triage Stage:  Accepted
    Has patch:  1                    |      Needs documentation:  0
  Needs tests:  0                    |  Patch needs improvement:  0
Easy pickings:  0                    |                    UI/UX:  0
-------------------------------------+-------------------------------------
Comment (by Natalia Bidart):

 Replying to [comment:19 Tim Graham]:
 > I remain unconvinced that this is a wise change. Are we going to
 document an ever growing list of
 [https://docs.djangoproject.com/en/dev/topics/settings/#creating-your-own-
 settings a disallowed settings names]? Disallowing something so generic as
 `LOGOUT_URL` seems like it will cause unneeded annoyance.
 >
 > Although the check could be disabled (usage of one disallowed setting
 requires disabling the check completely), this is more of a backward-
 incompatible change than a new feature.
 >
 > We have had
 
[https://github.com/django/django/commit/6192bffb130132461e55e5fe7a7eaaa9a166d08f
 temporary compatibility checks] to point out deprecated settings. I guess
 that may have been more visible than a deprecation warning in the case of
 `DEFAULT_FILE_STORAGE`.

 Hey Tim, thank you for sharing your thoughts. I appreciate your
 engagement. However, I want to clarify that the change was discussed and
 agreed upon in the Django Forum, which is where these conversations
 typically take place. The audience for ticket comments is smaller, so I
 encourage you to continue the discussion in the forum. This way, we can
 follow the usual process and involve more people in the conversation.

 Personally, I believe practicality beats purity, and in this case, the
 benefits of letting users know outweigh any potential issues with someone
 who chose to use a setting name that was deprecated by Django. Having said
 that, I agree that we should consider a way to ignore a subset of
 deprecated setting names. I'll consider this when reviewing the PR.
-- 
Ticket URL: <https://code.djangoproject.com/ticket/35674#comment:20>
Django <https://code.djangoproject.com/>
The Web framework for perfectionists with deadlines.

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"Django updates" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to [email protected].
To view this discussion on the web visit 
https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/django-updates/010701929ffbd3f9-f51d583f-ec59-4a64-b179-42d8a7766b2d-000000%40eu-central-1.amazonses.com.

Reply via email to