#35801: Signals are dispatched to receivers associated with dead senders
------------------------------+------------------------------------
     Reporter:  bobince       |                    Owner:  (none)
         Type:  Bug           |                   Status:  new
    Component:  Core (Other)  |                  Version:  5.1
     Severity:  Normal        |               Resolution:
     Keywords:                |             Triage Stage:  Accepted
    Has patch:  0             |      Needs documentation:  0
  Needs tests:  0             |  Patch needs improvement:  0
Easy pickings:  0             |                    UI/UX:  0
------------------------------+------------------------------------
Comment (by bobince):

 > Right, I would suggest receivers_called.clear()

 (Ha ha, what is this crazy new-fangled API? Oh... Python 3.3 you say.
 well. huh!)

 > Would you like to prepare a patch?

 Here's a candidate fix:
 https://github.com/bobince/django/compare/main..signals_from_dead_senders

 It raises some questions about what to do when ‘sender’ isn't weakreffable
 — which admittedly is uncommon, and would already break if ‘use_caching’,
 but there's no doc that rules it out as far as I can see. In this commit
 it quietly falls back to making a strong reference, which would _probably_
 be better than the buggy behaviour, but is still a change in behaviour.

 So would certainly appreciate thoughts from someone familiar with the
 background of dispatch before PR'ing.
-- 
Ticket URL: <https://code.djangoproject.com/ticket/35801#comment:4>
Django <https://code.djangoproject.com/>
The Web framework for perfectionists with deadlines.

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"Django updates" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to [email protected].
To view this discussion on the web visit 
https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/django-updates/0107019261cb695b-8eb3b8cd-4853-4388-b514-d62c091561aa-000000%40eu-central-1.amazonses.com.

Reply via email to