#35682: Clarify Base<FOO>View usage in docstrings.
-------------------------------------+-------------------------------------
     Reporter:  Jesús Leganés-       |                    Owner:
  Combarro                           |  YashRaj1506
         Type:                       |                   Status:  assigned
  Cleanup/optimization               |
    Component:  Generic views        |                  Version:  5.1
     Severity:  Normal               |               Resolution:
     Keywords:                       |             Triage Stage:  Accepted
    Has patch:  0                    |      Needs documentation:  0
  Needs tests:  0                    |  Patch needs improvement:  0
Easy pickings:  1                    |                    UI/UX:  0
-------------------------------------+-------------------------------------
Comment (by YashRaj1506):

 Replying to [comment:7 Clifford Gama]:
 > > So one way is We can add a docstring that this class(`BaseListView`)
 is meant to be subclassed by `ListView`, so use `ListView` and let
 `BaseListView` be just a base class meant to be inherited (we will raise a
 error too) . Would like to know your opinion, accordingly i will make the
 pr.
 >
 > I don't think that's quite accurate. While it is true that `ListView`
 subclasses `BaseListView`, it does not follow that `BaseListView` must
 always be subclassed by `ListView`.
 >
 > I think better is:
 >
 >      `Using this base class requires subclassing to provide a response
 mixin.`
 > which I copied from `BaseUpdateView`.
 >
 > Btw, you may want to look at other `BaseFOOView`s to see how they handle
 that, and also if other abstract base views are also missing that in their
 docstring.
 >

 I checked the other `Base<FOO>View` and yes as written in `BaseUpdateView`
 inside docstring

 `Using this base class requires subclassing to provide a response mixin.`

 this makes totally sense and while i checked `BaseDetailView` and
 `BaseListView` adding this very line would make things clear (As
 `BaseDetailView` is also using render_to_response` from
 `TemplateResponseMixin`) so my final proposal would be to add this

 `Using this base class requires subclassing to provide a response mixin.`

 inside the docstring of `BaseDetailView` and `BaseListView`.

 should i make the above mentioned changes and make the pr?
-- 
Ticket URL: <https://code.djangoproject.com/ticket/35682#comment:9>
Django <https://code.djangoproject.com/>
The Web framework for perfectionists with deadlines.

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"Django updates" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to [email protected].
To view this discussion on the web visit 
https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/django-updates/01070191659c4293-dc46af8c-7b28-4de6-8600-1ffe1df505f3-000000%40eu-central-1.amazonses.com.

Reply via email to