#35677: Unexpected behaviour of Prefetch with queryset filtering on a through 
model
-------------------------------------+-------------------------------------
     Reporter:  David Glenck         |                    Owner:  (none)
         Type:  Uncategorized        |                   Status:  closed
    Component:  Database layer       |                  Version:  5.1
  (models, ORM)                      |
     Severity:  Normal               |               Resolution:  needsinfo
     Keywords:  Prefetch,            |             Triage Stage:
  prefetch_related, many-to-many     |  Unreviewed
    Has patch:  0                    |      Needs documentation:  0
  Needs tests:  0                    |  Patch needs improvement:  0
Easy pickings:  0                    |                    UI/UX:  0
-------------------------------------+-------------------------------------
Comment (by Simon Charette):

 > I tried looking deeper into the QuerySet code to see if I can propose
 some patch. But it's rather complex code in there.

 I would search for the `_next_is_sticky()` token around
 `get_prefetch_querysets` implementations for many-to-many fields. It seems
 like we are already setting this flag in
 `ManyRelatedManager.get_prefetch_querysets` (can't link as Github is down)
 though so I'm surprised that the filter calls are not considered to be
 combined.
-- 
Ticket URL: <https://code.djangoproject.com/ticket/35677#comment:3>
Django <https://code.djangoproject.com/>
The Web framework for perfectionists with deadlines.

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"Django updates" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to [email protected].
To view this discussion on the web visit 
https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/django-updates/0107019153319d6d-ffff4dcb-1b4d-495a-9c08-c6350f7526d3-000000%40eu-central-1.amazonses.com.

Reply via email to