#35677: Unexpected behaviour of Prefetch with queryset filtering on a through
model
-------------------------------------+-------------------------------------
Reporter: David Glenck | Owner: (none)
Type: Uncategorized | Status: closed
Component: Database layer | Version: 5.1
(models, ORM) |
Severity: Normal | Resolution: needsinfo
Keywords: Prefetch, | Triage Stage:
prefetch_related, many-to-many | Unreviewed
Has patch: 0 | Needs documentation: 0
Needs tests: 0 | Patch needs improvement: 0
Easy pickings: 0 | UI/UX: 0
-------------------------------------+-------------------------------------
Comment (by Simon Charette):
> I tried looking deeper into the QuerySet code to see if I can propose
some patch. But it's rather complex code in there.
I would search for the `_next_is_sticky()` token around
`get_prefetch_querysets` implementations for many-to-many fields. It seems
like we are already setting this flag in
`ManyRelatedManager.get_prefetch_querysets` (can't link as Github is down)
though so I'm surprised that the filter calls are not considered to be
combined.
--
Ticket URL: <https://code.djangoproject.com/ticket/35677#comment:3>
Django <https://code.djangoproject.com/>
The Web framework for perfectionists with deadlines.
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"Django updates" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email
to [email protected].
To view this discussion on the web visit
https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/django-updates/0107019153319d6d-ffff4dcb-1b4d-495a-9c08-c6350f7526d3-000000%40eu-central-1.amazonses.com.