#8307: ImageFile use of width_field and height_field is slow with remote storage
backends
-------------------------------------+-------------------------------------
Reporter: sebastian.serrano@… | Owner: Jacob
Type: | Status: new
Cleanup/optimization |
Component: File | Version: dev
uploads/storage |
Severity: Normal | Resolution:
Keywords: imagefile height | Triage Stage: Accepted
width |
Has patch: 1 | Needs documentation: 0
Needs tests: 0 | Patch needs improvement: 0
Easy pickings: 0 | UI/UX: 0
-------------------------------------+-------------------------------------
Comment (by john-parton):
I've created a different pull request with a different approach, which is
better than my other patch in at least two ways:
* It removes an extra container class I was using as a signal for when to
update
* It removes an extra keyword argument I had to add (returning the
function signature to as it was before the patch)
https://github.com/django/django/pull/18070
I think we need to come to consensus on whether this is a bug that we can
just patch, or if this change is significant enough that we need to
introduce a setting to opt-in to the behavior (most likely changing the
setting in a future release).
--
Ticket URL: <https://code.djangoproject.com/ticket/8307#comment:22>
Django <https://code.djangoproject.com/>
The Web framework for perfectionists with deadlines.
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"Django updates" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email
to [email protected].
To view this discussion on the web visit
https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/django-updates/0107018ee23b048d-48ad42d3-629e-479f-bc0e-1ecc520e56a0-000000%40eu-central-1.amazonses.com.
