#35284: PositiveIntegerField description is confusing
-------------------------------------+-------------------------------------
Reporter: Jon Ribbens | Owner: nobody
Type: | Status: new
Cleanup/optimization |
Component: Documentation | Version: 5.0
Severity: Normal | Resolution:
Keywords: | Triage Stage:
| Unreviewed
Has patch: 1 | Needs documentation: 0
Needs tests: 0 | Patch needs improvement: 0
Easy pickings: 1 | UI/UX: 0
-------------------------------------+-------------------------------------
Comment (by bcail):
I don't think it's inaccurate to reference backwards compatibility - it
was [https://code.djangoproject.com/ticket/7609#comment:9 clearly
mentioned] in the previous ticket. But, if the docs make it sound like
users shouldn't store 0 in the field, maybe there's a clarification that
could be added to the docs.
--
Ticket URL: <https://code.djangoproject.com/ticket/35284#comment:2>
Django <https://code.djangoproject.com/>
The Web framework for perfectionists with deadlines.
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"Django updates" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email
to [email protected].
To view this discussion on the web visit
https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/django-updates/0107018e1f1bc4a6-51c91702-2b76-413e-9939-879902740187-000000%40eu-central-1.amazonses.com.
