#33213: Document coverage setup for parallel tests
-------------------------------------+-------------------------------------
Reporter: Mr. Glass | Owner: Paolo
| Melchiorre
Type: New feature | Status: closed
Component: Documentation | Version:
Severity: Normal | Resolution: fixed
Keywords: | Triage Stage: Accepted
Has patch: 0 | Needs documentation: 0
Needs tests: 0 | Patch needs improvement: 0
Easy pickings: 0 | UI/UX: 0
-------------------------------------+-------------------------------------
Changes (by GitHub <noreply@…>):
* status: new => closed
* resolution: => fixed
Comment:
In [changeset:"070cbac0dbf6a09b55aad322137ab168b75bf56b" 070cbac]:
{{{
#!CommitTicketReference repository=""
revision="070cbac0dbf6a09b55aad322137ab168b75bf56b"
Restored multiprocessing concurrency on coverage.py settings
* Revert "Reverted "Fixed #33213 -- Doc'd testing code coverage in
parallel and used it.""
This reverts commit 78da5ca0c1f2ab3201f8f6cd629e80d805ea023d.
* Restored coverage multiprocess concurrency with threads
Investigating https://github.com/nedbat/coveragepy/issues/1585 revealed
that thread tracing gets disabled when passing
`concurrency = multiprocessing`. Adding `thread` restores it, and
ensures that the `auser()` is reported as covered since the test suite
uses `AsyncToSync` to execute this middleware (which spawns threads).
}}}
--
Ticket URL: <https://code.djangoproject.com/ticket/33213#comment:15>
Django <https://code.djangoproject.com/>
The Web framework for perfectionists with deadlines.
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"Django updates" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email
to [email protected].
To view this discussion on the web visit
https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/django-updates/01070187c4502c47-01d177fa-f822-42a7-8f9b-fc014f92ffce-000000%40eu-central-1.amazonses.com.