#34158: Optimise count() for querysets that contain field lookups
-------------------------------------+-------------------------------------
               Reporter:  Irfan      |          Owner:  nobody
                   Type:             |         Status:  new
  Cleanup/optimization               |
              Component:  Database   |        Version:  4.1
  layer (models, ORM)                |
               Severity:  Normal     |       Keywords:
           Triage Stage:             |      Has patch:  0
  Unreviewed                         |
    Needs documentation:  0          |    Needs tests:  0
Patch needs improvement:  0          |  Easy pickings:  0
                  UI/UX:  0          |
-------------------------------------+-------------------------------------
 [https://github.com/mo3rfan/django-qs-
 count/blob/main/test_orm/testapp/tests.py#L31-L32 These two lines are
 equivalent in terms of the count], yet [https://github.com/mo3rfan/django-
 qs-count/actions/runs/3467684164/jobs/5792783131#step:3:351 one is much
 slower than the other].

 Is there a way Django's {{{count()}}} can be optimised for such querysets?

 This becomes especially useful for
 [https://docs.djangoproject.com/en/4.1/ref/paginator/ Paginators] where
 {{{count()}}} is used
 [https://github.com/django/django/blob/4.1.3/django/core/paginator.py#L78
 internally], and such querysets with large number of rows containing
 foreign key field lookups won't slowdown pagination due to the unnecessary
 joins.

-- 
Ticket URL: <https://code.djangoproject.com/ticket/34158>
Django <https://code.djangoproject.com/>
The Web framework for perfectionists with deadlines.

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"Django updates" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to [email protected].
To view this discussion on the web visit 
https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/django-updates/010701847a2dae46-a18fa60c-9212-4f1b-85db-dfe3e0f1c177-000000%40eu-central-1.amazonses.com.

Reply via email to