#8576: Multiple AutoFields in a model
-------------------------------------+-------------------------------------
     Reporter:  honeyman             |                    Owner:  nobody
         Type:  Uncategorized        |                   Status:  closed
    Component:  Database layer       |                  Version:  dev
  (models, ORM)                      |
     Severity:  Normal               |               Resolution:  wontfix
     Keywords:  multiple autofield   |             Triage Stage:  Design
                                     |  decision needed
    Has patch:  0                    |      Needs documentation:  0
  Needs tests:  0                    |  Patch needs improvement:  0
Easy pickings:  0                    |                    UI/UX:  0
-------------------------------------+-------------------------------------
Changes (by logikonabstractions):

 * ui_ux:   => 0
 * type:   => Uncategorized
 * severity:   => Normal
 * easy:   => 0


Comment:

 Know this is closed, but again just to provide perspective.

 I could really have used this feature actually. I have a project with
 existing data where they use as an ID an auto-increment (just like
 Django's default id). However, they also use a different no_header.
 Sometimes they create revision on their object, so basically their db ends
 up looking like this:

 id     no_header     suite
 1      1                      0
 2      2                      0
 3      1                      1
 4      3                      0
 ......

 So essentially, the no_header is an auto-increment, that only increments
 on the creation of new objects (with suite=0). If an object undergo some
 specific operation, then its no_header remains the same, but suite += 1.

 Which means that the no_header ends up running "behind" the id field, but
 it still needs to be an auto-increment. Of course I can override save() &
 do all that business there, but it would still be so much simpler to just
 have 2 auto-increment fields. IMO this is a conception flaw in the
 database backends - e.g there isn't an obvious reason to limit auto
 increment to a single field, if a separate attributes allows specifying
 what is a primary key. But I digress. Mostly wanted to illustrate a use
 case.

-- 
Ticket URL: <https://code.djangoproject.com/ticket/8576#comment:9>
Django <https://code.djangoproject.com/>
The Web framework for perfectionists with deadlines.

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"Django updates" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to [email protected].
To view this discussion on the web visit 
https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/django-updates/066.7ebb2291250e63570175501e88ffc7d5%40djangoproject.com.

Reply via email to