Hi Jon, Thank you for your input.
Le samedi 5 août 2023 à 19:43:57 UTC+2, Jon Janzen a écrit : There are a few key things missing from core django before that's possible. Some of which are laid out in that forum thread I linked above, others are listed directly in the DEP like the ORM being fully asyncified (right now it's just an async wrapper around sync code) which is somewhat blocked on async database implementations (psycopg3 being the first one supported). >From my understanding, async ORM calls are wrapped with sync_to_async, and this status-quo will remain for synchronous database libraries, such as psycopg2. I also understand that the heavy lifting in async_to_sync and sync_to_async wrapper has been implemented <https://docs.djangoproject.com/en/4.2/topics/async/#async-to-sync> and the hard work like thread affinity is managed by these wrapper. If I try to improve my own work on #34717, a simple change as this one <https://github.com/olibook/django/commit/844590eeec60126674fe6c4e348db343a3ec5646> passes all the tests on sqlite and postgres. Any idea of what could break with this kind of changes ? Cheers - Olivier -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Django developers (Contributions to Django itself)" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to django-developers+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/django-developers/3e860290-7cf3-461d-b595-250c167e53f3n%40googlegroups.com.
