I'm also against adding get_or_none(), for the same reasons. Adding a method to shortcut something that can already be done doesn't seem worth it to me.
On Sat, Jul 9, 2022 at 1:56 PM Mariusz Felisiak <felisiak.mari...@gmail.com> wrote: > I'm against it because it's already easily achievable and it's debatable > how it should behave with many results. IMO any new method would be > confusing and in the case of unique filtering `get_or_none(unique_filters)` > would be an alias for `.filter(unique_filters).first()`. To me, this is > duplication of an API. > > There are several -0 in the previous thread (Shai, Florian) and you can > count -1 from me. > > Best, > Mariusz > > -- > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups > "Django developers (Contributions to Django itself)" group. > To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an > email to django-developers+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. > To view this discussion on the web visit > https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/django-developers/aeb9be96-ec03-48f9-ae97-2859b62a1df6n%40googlegroups.com > <https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/django-developers/aeb9be96-ec03-48f9-ae97-2859b62a1df6n%40googlegroups.com?utm_medium=email&utm_source=footer> > . > -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Django developers (Contributions to Django itself)" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to django-developers+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/django-developers/CAMyDDM20TNRrFpDamKu%2Bc_Dxxbh0KH5pJjxxmqYLjL6CNzAW7g%40mail.gmail.com.
