I've had similar issues. I just avoid squashing anymore. It's just not with the 
pain, and having so many little files that get looked at a minimal amount of 
time isn't worth fretting over. Saying that, I'd love to get it fixed...

Sent from my Verizon, Samsung Galaxy smartphone
Get Outlook for Android<https://aka.ms/ghei36>

________________________________
From: 'Mike Lissner' via Django developers (Contributions to Django itself) 
<django-developers@googlegroups.com>
Sent: Tuesday, May 11, 2021 7:50:31 PM
To: Django developers (Contributions to Django itself) 
<django-developers@googlegroups.com>
Subject: Do people actually squash migrations?

I have a pretty big django project, and since I created the 100th migration 
within one of its apps today, I thought I'd finally do some squashing. It 
hasn't gone well, but I eventually got the data migrations cleaned up.

Finally, I run it, and it runs smack into a CircularDependencyError, as 
described here:

https://code.djangoproject.com/ticket/23337

Basically, from what I understand, after the squash you have one migration that 
depends on various others from your other apps. Naturally, that totally falls 
over, because can't go from this series of migrations:

app1: migration 1
app2: migration 1
app2: migration 2
app1: migration 2

To, well...any series of migrations in which migration 1&2 from app1 or app2 
have been squashed. The docs have something to say about this*, but it feels 
like this must affect practically any biggish project.

Stackoverflow also has a variety of dubious (and very complex) advice (read it 
and weep):

https://stackoverflow.com/questions/37711402/circular-dependency-when-squashing-django-migrations

So, my question is: Do people actually use squashmigrations with success? And 
if not, is it reasonable to consider deprecating it or fixing the bug, or 
updating the docs to loudly say it largely doesn't work? I'm surprised the 
issue above has so little movement since it was created seven years ago.

Maybe it's just me? If not, it'd be nice to do something to help future people 
with ambitions of a simple squash.

Thanks,


Mike

* Note that model interdependencies in Django can get very complex, and 
squashing may result in migrations that do not run; either mis-optimized (in 
which case you can try again with --no-optimize, though you should also report 
an issue), or with a CircularDependencyError, in which case you can manually 
resolve it.

To manually resolve a CircularDependencyError, break out one of the ForeignKeys 
in the circular dependency loop into a separate migration, and move the 
dependency on the other app with it. If you’re unsure, see how 
makemigrations<https://us-east-2.protection.sophos.com?d=djangoproject.com&u=aHR0cHM6Ly9kb2NzLmRqYW5nb3Byb2plY3QuY29tL2VuLzMuMS9yZWYvZGphbmdvLWFkbWluLyNkamFuZ28tYWRtaW4tbWFrZW1pZ3JhdGlvbnM=&i=NWVjN2YxNzUxNGEyNzMxNmMyMGRkZGU1&t=OVFwYmVaMGVKZ2phcWpWUmRBZmZFK09TQjh6bGtHaGpCVXdGSklWVWZ0ND0=&h=b5f442795e5e456485245d491bee80a4>
 deals with the problem when asked to create brand new migrations from your 
models. In a future release of Django, 
squashmigrations<https://us-east-2.protection.sophos.com?d=djangoproject.com&u=aHR0cHM6Ly9kb2NzLmRqYW5nb3Byb2plY3QuY29tL2VuLzMuMS9yZWYvZGphbmdvLWFkbWluLyNkamFuZ28tYWRtaW4tc3F1YXNobWlncmF0aW9ucw==&i=NWVjN2YxNzUxNGEyNzMxNmMyMGRkZGU1&t=SWNaWFlpZWFoSWZNNXQ0c240V2ovN0JOKysvNDJlWHM5cnRVQ3BHNmlJUT0=&h=b5f442795e5e456485245d491bee80a4>
 will be updated to attempt to resolve these errors itself. [Author's note: 
These sentences really leave me blowing in the wind...maybe I can figure out 
what they mean, I guess? I thought squashing was supposed to be easy.]



--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"Django developers (Contributions to Django itself)" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to 
django-developers+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com<mailto:django-developers+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com>.
To view this discussion on the web visit 
https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/django-developers/87f449bc-d653-427a-ac28-879ee0701c8bn%40googlegroups.com<https://us-east-2.protection.sophos.com?d=google.com&u=aHR0cHM6Ly9ncm91cHMuZ29vZ2xlLmNvbS9kL21zZ2lkL2RqYW5nby1kZXZlbG9wZXJzLzg3ZjQ0OWJjLWQ2NTMtNDI3YS1hYzI4LTg3OWVlMDcwMWM4Ym4lNDBnb29nbGVncm91cHMuY29tP3V0bV9tZWRpdW09ZW1haWwmdXRtX3NvdXJjZT1mb290ZXI=&i=NWVjN2YxNzUxNGEyNzMxNmMyMGRkZGU1&t=cWhoRWVVNlpibE1SK2dtTHNQVm5XYzFBSS9TeDRpMWtETDI4WVY2MG9BND0=&h=b5f442795e5e456485245d491bee80a4>.

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"Django developers  (Contributions to Django itself)" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to django-developers+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
To view this discussion on the web visit 
https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/django-developers/SN6PR05MB3951135EF4ECFE249F51ED4BF1529%40SN6PR05MB3951.namprd05.prod.outlook.com.
  • Do ... 'Mike Lissner' via Django developers (Contributions to Django itself)
    • ... Matthew Pava
      • ... Kye Russell
        • ... Andrew Godwin
          • ... 'Mike Lissner' via Django developers (Contributions to Django itself)
            • ... 'Mike Lissner' via Django developers (Contributions to Django itself)
              • ... Ryan Hiebert
              • ... Hanne Moa
            • ... René Fleschenberg
              • ... 'Mike Lissner' via Django developers (Contributions to Django itself)
            • ... Shai Berger
    • ... Raffaele Salmaso

Reply via email to