My thoughts: Use and promote a different name that does not make it sound like Django is making the string safe for you.
Alias the new name to the old names to prevent churn. Remove all references of the old name from the docs. What the name should be, meh. On Thu, 20 Feb 2020 at 03:56, Adam Johnson <m...@adamj.eu> wrote: > Sorry I was a bit keen after a reminder of the thread by Josh Smeaton on > reddit. I skimmed again and it felt like there was consensus on some kind > of rename, and it had moved to decision on the name. I guess I'm also sick > of fixing this in client projects :) > > I think your concerns are fair and well-reasoned as always Carlton. You've > convinced me this isn't worth it. > > I'd love to see a bleach "battery" too. Was not aware of html5lib going > unmaintained - it does highlight that there's a lot to do elsewhere in the > ecosystem. > > On Wed, 19 Feb 2020 at 14:20, Carlton Gibson <carlton.gib...@gmail.com> > wrote: > >> I've just closed the ticket as wontfix, because I'm not seeing a >> consensus for the change here. I'm seeing a few Yeahs and a few Mehs. >> That doesn't mean we can't have it, but the procedure is generally agree >> here before a ticket. >> So can I ask, those wanting this, to make the case here, then we can >> re-open the ticket if there is a general agreement. >> >> <opinion open-to-change=true> >> FWIW I'm not convinced. The warnings on the mark_safe() docs are pretty >> clear cut. >> I think users will just use whatever gets their content on the screen, >> probably knowing it's not safe, but telling themselves >> that they'll come back later. Change the names and that will still be the >> same. >> There'll just have been a massive load of busywork in between. >> >> Ideally we'd just ship Bleach &co. That's a battery we could include. >> But we can't really do that, because html5lib is unmaintained, and >> there's no alternative. >> Whatever effort there is to be spent on this, I'd rather see it spent >> there. >> </opinion> >> >> Kind Regards, >> >> Carlton >> >> >> On Wednesday, 19 February 2020 10:11:11 UTC+1, Adam Johnson wrote: >>> >>> I made a ticket for this: https://code.djangoproject.com/ticket/31287 >>> >> -- >> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups >> "Django developers (Contributions to Django itself)" group. >> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an >> email to django-developers+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. >> To view this discussion on the web visit >> https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/django-developers/aa60f3b6-0ace-45fc-9698-6b54e317e091%40googlegroups.com >> <https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/django-developers/aa60f3b6-0ace-45fc-9698-6b54e317e091%40googlegroups.com?utm_medium=email&utm_source=footer> >> . >> > > > -- > Adam > > -- > You received this message because you are subscribed to a topic in the > Google Groups "Django developers (Contributions to Django itself)" group. > To unsubscribe from this topic, visit > https://groups.google.com/d/topic/django-developers/AvgxWR-0VrE/unsubscribe > . > To unsubscribe from this group and all its topics, send an email to > django-developers+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. > To view this discussion on the web visit > https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/django-developers/CAMyDDM091w46Pt%3DkiAbU5qgTxOj-_BE5hqz7qZeNNBGkG-RX_A%40mail.gmail.com > <https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/django-developers/CAMyDDM091w46Pt%3DkiAbU5qgTxOj-_BE5hqz7qZeNNBGkG-RX_A%40mail.gmail.com?utm_medium=email&utm_source=footer> > . > -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Django developers (Contributions to Django itself)" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to django-developers+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/django-developers/CAPbDM0f3NKg2YybMu8jjFLeW4KWXcN1ptGqXeSrCSCqH7jr-0g%40mail.gmail.com.
