Hello, Aymeric

Thanks for your reply.

CREATE INDEX CONCURRENTLY is a big part for zero downtime migrations 
support, but there are too many additional questions as should ALTER TABLE 
ADD COLUMN UNIQUE splitted to CREATE INDEX and constraint creation or 
should be handled FOREGN KEY, CHECK and NOT NULL constraints creation that 
can take ACCESS EXCLUSIVE for long time on huge table or is it accessible 
to avoid transactions in highlighted above cases?

Unfortunately I don't know what direction django planned to develop, so I 
can go different ways without support.

Is it a good idea to create ticket about zero downtime migrations support 
with detailed proposition of improvements and backward compatibility 
support?

Regards, Paveł

On Sunday, 7 October 2018 10:31:27 UTC+3, Aymeric Augustin wrote:
>
> Hello Pavel,
>
> There's an accepted ticket about CREATE INDEX CONCURRENTLY: 
> https://code.djangoproject.com/ticket/21039. A concrete proposal for 
> adding this feature to Django would be interesting.
>
> I'm not really sure about your two other suggestions. If you think they're 
> improving the PostgreSQL backend, you're welcome to create a ticket and 
> propose a pull request.
>
> Keep in mind backwards-compatibility if changes are improvements in your 
> use case but perhaps not for everyone else. For example, it may be better 
> that index creating remain an atomic operation (so, not concurrent) by 
> default.
>
> Best regards,
>
> -- 
> Aymeric.
>
>
>
> On 26 Sep 2018, at 07:41, pavel.t...@gmail.com <javascript:> wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> I found that django migrations don't designed for live updates on large 
> tables for postgres, eg. index creation doesn't use concurrently or alter 
> table operation can take ACCESS EXCLUSIVE lock for long time.
>
> Before I mostly wrote custom migrations, but after one of downtime I 
> decided to avoid most common cases at all and wrote postgres backend that 
> helps me in it: 
> https://github.com/tbicr/django-pg-zero-downtime-migrations. When I wrote 
> it I found that it's a pretty easy extend core postgres backend, but a few 
> things required rewrite on my side:
>
> - 
> https://github.com/django/django/blob/master/django/db/backends/base/schema.py#L152
>  
> used both for table columns creation and altering table add column, but not 
> null constraint and index constraints can't be changed without whole method 
> rewriting
> - for one core sql statement I found more "safe" equivalent with two sql 
> statements, but it's a bit hard to execute it, for example more save create 
> invalid constraint and than validate it or create concurrently index and 
> than create unique constraint
>
> also I found that not all constraint names quoted in generated sql, for 
> example add_unique_together got `ALTER TABLE "table_name" ADD CONSTRAINT 
> table_name_f1_f2_hash_uniq UNIQUE ("f1", "f2")`, but expected `ALTER TABLE 
> "table_name" ADD CONSTRAINT "table_name_f1_f2_hash_uniq" UNIQUE ("f1", 
> "f2")`
>
> So I just curious is anybody interested to make django migrations more 
> reliable for large tables in prod or interested in some improvements 
> highlighted above, that can simplify writing backends for this purpose?
>
> I also will be appreciated if somebody can share another solutions for 
> this purpose.
>
> Paveł
>
> -- 
> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
> "Django developers (Contributions to Django itself)" group.
> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an 
> email to django-develop...@googlegroups.com <javascript:>.
> To post to this group, send email to django-d...@googlegroups.com 
> <javascript:>.
> Visit this group at https://groups.google.com/group/django-developers.
> To view this discussion on the web visit 
> https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/django-developers/421f001b-ca11-42bf-8735-0c6947b41988%40googlegroups.com
>  
> <https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/django-developers/421f001b-ca11-42bf-8735-0c6947b41988%40googlegroups.com?utm_medium=email&utm_source=footer>
> .
> For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
>
>
>

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"Django developers  (Contributions to Django itself)" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to django-developers+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
To post to this group, send email to django-developers@googlegroups.com.
Visit this group at https://groups.google.com/group/django-developers.
To view this discussion on the web visit 
https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/django-developers/c14b53e6-3995-4c21-9993-dcaf8e22b825%40googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

Reply via email to