On 02/09/18 19:59, Shivam Jindal wrote: > Hi Lan, > > *m.user.refresh_from_db()* is sam as > > *u = m.user* > *u.refresh_from_db()* > > So If I am refreshing u, it should update all relationship and property > of *u*(including reverse relation). Should It not? >
Hi Shivam, As far as I can tell, u.refresh_from_db() only cares about making sure u's state is in sync with the database. It doesn't care about the state of any related objects, like m. I suspect that cascading the sync to related objects would be difficult to get right and might be unexpected behaviour to other users. I'm still not convinced this is a bug and even if it is, I think it would require a deprecation cycle to change, so I don't think it would be worth it. Just calling m.refresh_from_db() instead seems sufficient to me. Ian -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Django developers (Contributions to Django itself)" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to django-developers+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. To post to this group, send email to django-developers@googlegroups.com. Visit this group at https://groups.google.com/group/django-developers. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/django-developers/cdd0e68f-64e8-ef1c-5022-9ecab4ba604e%40feete.org. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
