Thanks, what is missing to me is the technical discussions. Now, I see 
there is a draft DEP: 
https://github.com/django/deps/blob/master/draft/0006-channels.rst. If that 
was shared to this list, I missed it. Perhaps it would have inspired some 
discussion in your proposal [0] which didn't get any feedback. That was the 
oddest part of the process to me. When you asked for feedback about whether 
or not the project should be adopted as an official project, no one said 
anything and the default action was to continue the process. It would have 
been nice to see some enthusiasm from others about the merits of adopting 
it as an official project.

[0] 
https://groups.google.com/d/topic/django-developers/24DGLVVRV_s/discussion

On Friday, September 9, 2016 at 11:14:25 AM UTC-4, Andrew Godwin wrote:
>
> Of course - here is the email I sent to the board:
>
> ---
>
> Hello everyone,
>
> As per DEP 7 (
> https://github.com/django/deps/blob/master/final/0007-official-projects.rst), 
> I would like to propose Channels as an official Django project. 
> Specifically, I would like to have the following repos as official Django 
> projects:
>
> andrewgodwin/channels
> andrewgodwin/daphne
> andrewgodwin/asgi_redis
> andrewgodwin/asgi_ipc
> andrewgodwin/asgiref
>
> I debated whether to not include asgiref and asgi_ipc, but I think it is 
> in the project's best interest to have them both as they are both valuable 
> and small in scope.
>
> The proposed shepherd is myself, and the proposed maintenance team is 
> myself, Steven Davidson, and Jeremy Spencer. The other two maintainers are 
> relatively new to contributing but I aim to mentor them up to full 
> maintenance over the coming months; I will also continue to look for a more 
> experienced Django community member to help me with this process.
>
> I will abstain from any vote, but my personal view is that this would 
> benefit Django, and that it draws the right balance between not including 
> it in core straight away but still having it under the official Django 
> umbrella.
>
> If you have any questions or clarifications, please say and I'm happy to 
> discuss.
>
> ---
>
> Andrew
>
> On Fri, Sep 9, 2016 at 4:08 PM, Tim Graham <timog...@gmail.com 
> <javascript:>> wrote:
>
>> Could you please share the information that you submitted to the 
>> technical board as per the DEP: "The Shepherd will submit the project, the 
>> list of people signed up for the Maintenance Team, and the collated 
>> arguments to the Technical Board for decision."
>>
>> In hindsight, I expected that information to be shared on this mailing 
>> list before project is submitted to the technical board. Would it make 
>> sense to do that in the future?
>>
>>
>> On Friday, September 9, 2016 at 10:58:24 AM UTC-4, Andrew Godwin wrote:
>>>
>>> Hi everyone,
>>>
>>> The Technical Board approved Channels as an official Django project as 
>>> per DEP 7, and so the repositories have been moved under the django/ 
>>> project on GitHub, as well as a few other things the DEP requires, and 
>>> improving the contribution guidelines and triaging tickets.
>>>
>>> You can read more in the announcement: 
>>> https://www.djangoproject.com/weblog/2016/sep/09/channels-adopted-official-django-project/
>>>
>>> If you have any questions about what this means, I'm happy to answer 
>>> them here! I'm aiming for a 1.0 release reasonably soon, after one or two 
>>> minor breaking changes that need to be done (there'll be deprecation 
>>> warning code in there so things don't mysteriously break on upgrade).
>>>
>>> Andrew
>>>
>> -- 
>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
>> "Django developers (Contributions to Django itself)" group.
>> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an 
>> email to django-develop...@googlegroups.com <javascript:>.
>> To post to this group, send email to django-d...@googlegroups.com 
>> <javascript:>.
>> Visit this group at https://groups.google.com/group/django-developers.
>> To view this discussion on the web visit 
>> https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/django-developers/d8e29c3b-1cc4-4329-a3ec-968b73417b6f%40googlegroups.com
>>  
>> <https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/django-developers/d8e29c3b-1cc4-4329-a3ec-968b73417b6f%40googlegroups.com?utm_medium=email&utm_source=footer>
>> .
>> For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
>>
>
>

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"Django developers  (Contributions to Django itself)" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to django-developers+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
To post to this group, send email to django-developers@googlegroups.com.
Visit this group at https://groups.google.com/group/django-developers.
To view this discussion on the web visit 
https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/django-developers/b3f050fb-e5fc-4679-abea-58cf521caed3%40googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

Reply via email to