On Tuesday, July 26, 2016 at 11:16:18 PM UTC+2, Aymeric Augustin wrote: > > > Specifically, please explain why this has to live in Django.
Because Django has an implementation which can be extended without rewritting a whole thing from scratch? Well... it is your decision about "including batteries" into the framework, making it full-stack... I like quite opposite design, personally, but here is a guy who did useful improvement and his work was dropped because of... including another useful battery. I know that every line of code needs to be maintained and you're very careful with adding new features. But maybe there is a good time to think about decoupling Django? BR, Marcin -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Django developers (Contributions to Django itself)" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to django-developers+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. To post to this group, send email to django-developers@googlegroups.com. Visit this group at https://groups.google.com/group/django-developers. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/django-developers/387c7fc9-bf01-4654-9e71-2fc01be5b352%40googlegroups.com. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
