It would be helpful if you could sketch out the proposal a bit more -- maybe write some documentation that explains and motivates the feature (and put explanation in this thread). The pull request description has some explanation but it doesn't seem suited toward someone unfamiliar with the background of the ticket which could explain the lack of response here.
On Wednesday, January 6, 2016 at 10:04:51 AM UTC-5, Owais Lone wrote: > > Hi, I would really appreciate if someone could review the API design (and > implementation) for a PR I created. The PR implements support for fields > that are assigned a value by the database (using a default value or > trigger) instead of Django. It also adds support for PostgreSQL’s RETURNING > and Oracle’s RETURNING INTO clauses. > > This will allow us to have AutoField like behaviour on fields other than > the primary key or have primary key fields other than Integer and > BigInteger types. > > The PR also sets the stage for returning primary keys (and optionally > other fields) from the bulk_create operation on PostgreSQL and Oracle. > > Pull request: https://github.com/django/django/pull/5904 > Django ticket: https://code.djangoproject.com/ticket/21454 > > Thanks -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Django developers (Contributions to Django itself)" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to django-developers+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. To post to this group, send email to django-developers@googlegroups.com. Visit this group at https://groups.google.com/group/django-developers. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/django-developers/9612ab62-df34-438f-b475-1d96eb52ecb6%40googlegroups.com. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
