On Nov 23, 2014, at 1:53 PM, Rick van Hattem <wo...@wol.ph> wrote: > Very true, that's a fair point. That's why I'm opting for a configurable > option. Patching this within Django has saved me in quite a few cases but it > can have drawbacks.
As a DB guy, I have to say that if an application is sending a query that expects to get 100 results back but gets 1,000,000 back, you have a bug that needs to be tracked down and fixed. Patching it by limiting the results is kind of a database version of "except: pass" to get rid of an inconvenient but mysterious exception. -- -- Christophe Pettus x...@thebuild.com -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Django developers (Contributions to Django itself)" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to django-developers+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. To post to this group, send email to django-developers@googlegroups.com. Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/django-developers. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/django-developers/09B28BB5-13DE-43B3-830F-F10E8AA7B5EC%40thebuild.com. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
